Bow hunting ban

Bow-hunting ban set to fly in South Australia

Bows and crossbows are to be banned from general hunting use in South Australia under planned changes to the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 by the Department of Environment and Water (DEW).

A letter, seen by Sporting Shooter, has been sent out to a number of stakeholders in SA advising them the state government will be banning general hunting via bows or crossbows.

The changes will be accomplished by amending what a Basic Hunting Permit allows, removing the ability for a holder to use a bow or crossbow when hunting — even on private property with landowner permission.

While the changes have not yet been implemented, it is clear they are a done deal despite resistance from the Australian Bowhunters Association and other hunting organisations.

The stakeholder letter acknowledges the changes “may have some impact on your business” and says “the department would better like to understand how the ban can best be implemented”, before requesting the stakeholder’s input via an online feedback portal.

Interestingly, DEW explicitly stated the ban will not apply to landowners, their household, and employees or agents who are culling feral animals causing damage to crops, stock or other property; or to Aboriginal people hunting for food or non-commercial purposes, as these groups are exempted from needing a Basic Hunting Permit to hunt and, as a result, will still be able to employ bows and crossbows for those purposes if they wish.

DEW has also explicitly said bows and crossbows will remain legal to buy and own, and can still be used for archery, arbalistry and other “recreational purposes which do not involve hunting”.

The ban was challenged by Pauline Hanson’s One Nation MP Sarah Game MLC in November.

However, Climate, Environment and Water Minister Kyam Maher said the ALP had a “longstanding commitment to ban hunting with bows and crossbows since before the 2018 election”.

He said this commitment “has been published in letters to the Animal Justice Party and in response to a survey by South Aussies for Animals Inc” —  in other words, it was not made public the way election promises are generally supposed to be.

Mr Maher went on to say the ban will not limit hunting with guns, which remained legal, but rejected calls for compensation for sporting goods dealers and hunters affected by the bowhunting ban.

“As it is only the act of hunting animals, specifically birds and mammals, with bow or crossbow in South Australia that will be banned, there is currently no plan to compensate business or hunters,” he said. 

“Bow hunting equipment will not be rendered useless as this ban will not limit the use or ownership of bows or crossbows for purposes not involving the killing of birds or mammals. 

“For example, owners will still be able to use their archery equipment for target archery or bow hunting in other jurisdictions where it remains legal.” 

Currently there is no announced timeframe for the ban’s implementation but it is very much a case of when, not if.




Like it? Share with your friends!

What's Your Reaction?

super super
fail fail
fun fun
bad bad
hate hate
lol lol
love love
omg omg
Royce Wilson

Royce is something rare in Australia: A journalist who really likes guns. He has been interested in firearms as long as he can remember, and is particularly interested in military and police firearms from the 19th Century to the present. In addition to historical and collectible firearms, he is also a keen video gamer and has written for several major newspapers and websites on that subject.

One Comment

  1. Wouldn’t the second dot point, below, be fairly easy to comply with? You could be an “agent” of a landholder simply by getting written permission from the landholder to hunt feral species like deer, pig, rabbit, goat, or foxes that all cause damage to “crops, stock or other property” (e.g. grazing, soil degradation, predation). There doesn’t have to be a fee involved for anyone. Probably not the best idea to create a ruckus if it’s easy to comply with. I reckon they just want a paper trail incase something goes wrong.

    From SA gov website:

    Who is not impacted?

    This ban is not intended to impact on hunting animals where a Basic Hunting Permit is not required, such as when:

    An Aboriginal person is hunting for food for themselves or their family, or for cultural purposes and non-commercially.
    Landholders, family members or an agent of a landholder destroy animal of a species not protected by the NPW Act that are causing damage to crops, stock or other property on the land.
    Someone destroys an animal of a species not protected by the NPW Act that is endangering human life.